I’m not sure if anyone has ever conducted a study on the topic, but there’s no question that if given a choice, lawyers always want to get the counsel table that’s closest to the jury. I’m no exception, but I’m not exactly sure why. I guess the theory is that jurors are more likely to bond with whatever lawyers are right in front of their noses, as opposed to those other lawyers all the way across the room.
Some judges dole out the counsel table by tradition or by rule; usually, the plaintiffs’ counsel gets the table nearest the jury. Others assign the tables on a first-come, first-served basis.
If table location is something you care about, be sure to find out the judge’s practice well in advance of the trial. And if it’s first-come, first-served, be sure to send someone to the courthouse when it opens to secure the table closest to the jury.



In early days, the State or prosecution and hence the plaintiff, as well, always sat next to the judge and/or the jury. It should be that way still. If you have run across a judge who does not adhere to this, he/she probably doesnt care about the order of proof either. I have never come across this.
Posted by: mark | November 10, 2004 at 01:21 PM
Edward Bennett Williams hated that he could not sit closest to the jury in criminal trials. Thus, each morning he would would move the prosecutor's table 6-inches further from the jury box and his own table 6-inches nearer.
Posted by: Fed.No.84 | November 11, 2004 at 05:21 PM