My Photo

Search Illinois Trial Practice


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by TypePad

    ccl

    ga

    « Briefs: Make Them Shorter . . . and Trials Too | Main | Cross-Examination Doesn't Begin and End with Irving Younger »

    June 20, 2005

    Discovery Tip: Interrogatories About Requests for Admissions

    Requests for admissions should be accompanied by a separate interrogatory that says something like this: "To the extent that any of your responses to any of Defendant's requests for admissions is other than an unqualified admission, list all facts on which you based any part of your response that is not an unqualified admission, identify all documents memorializing each such fact, and identify all persons with knowledge of each such fact."

    To my mind, it's this interrogatory that's one of the most useful parts of the request-for-admissions procedure. By changing the interrogatory slightly, you can also use it to discover documents and deponents concerning admissions.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d4b53ef00d834595d5569e2

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Discovery Tip: Interrogatories About Requests for Admissions:

    » "Discovery Tip: Interrogatories About Requests for Admissions" from Stark County Law Library Blawg
    Evan Schaeffer posts: “Requests for admissions should be accompanied by a separate interrogatory that says something like this: "To the [Read More]

    Comments

    Do you include the interrogatory in the same document as the request to admit, or does it go in a separate one? Also, does the interrogatory count against your overall interrogatory limit?

    RGR

    Rich: The interrogatory goes in a separate document, and it would count against the limit, though the limit can be extended with leave of court.

    Great tip! I used it yesterday.

    In California, the Judicial Council has propounded Form Interrogatories that are fairly generic, but #17 is identical (or nearly so) to your proposed language.

    California has a pretty good system in this regard. As pointed out above, it has a form interrogatory 17.1 that asks for all available information if the party denies a request for admission. And, the form interrogatory does not count against the limit. Plus, the limit on interrogatories and requests for admission can be avoided by counsel's sworn statement than more than the limit(35) is necessary. In any type of complex case I've never had a problem with exceeding the limit. Here's an interesting website re California discovery law and requests for admissions http://www.discoveryreferee.com/a6whyarentyou.htm and here's the text of form interrogatory 17.1

    17.0 Responses to Request for Admissions

    17.1 Is your response to each request for admission served with these interrogatories an unqualified admission? If not, for each response that is not an unqualified admission:

    (a) state the number of the request;
    (b) state all facts upon which you base your response;
    (c) state the names, ADDRESSES, and telephone numbers of all PERSONS who have knowledge of those facts;
    (d) identify all DOCUMENTS and other tangible things that support your response and state the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of the PERSON who has each DOCUMENT or thing.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment