My Photo

About Evan Schaeffer

Blog powered by Typepad

ccl

ga

« Improve Your Legal Writing with LegalWriting.Net | Main | Fixing Deposition Transcripts When Your Questions Are Messed Up »

May 31, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d4b53ef00d8342cb7bd53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference You're Going to Use a Document in a Deposition? Be Sure to Read It First:

» "You're Going to Use a Document in a Deposition? Be Sure to Read It First" from Stark County Law Library Blog
Evan Schaeffer posts: “You're preparing for a deposition. You have a stack of documents you may or may not use. [Read More]

Comments

Christopher King

I would agree with all of those things and provide you the following case in point analysis, involving a criminal trial set for 12 June 2006, final pretrial tomorrow, 1 June 2006:

The State of NH obtained a continuance to obtain a copy of a Deposition that I took of Chief Dunn in a Civil Case last year, allegedly because I made incriminating statements about myself. The state actually tried to make me pay for a copy of it and provide it at my own criminal trial, but the Judge correctly ruled that the state had to obtain a copy.

So it did, now it refuses to file a copy with the Court or to provide one to my attorneys who have been working their butts off, largely pro bono for the past 12 months in an "attempted felony extortion" case stemming from me writing a Demand Letter to the Jaffrey NH police Chief Martin Dunn as legal director of Southern-Tier NH NAACP in 2004.

The depo. is nasty, with Chief Dunn and attorney Charlie Bauer acting like white men of privilege -- which they are -- actually laughing at a hate mail letter I got talking about the possibility of me getting my ass reamed in prison. I noted it on the record. There is much more that I won't go into in this space, but suffice it to say, if a Jury heard it or read it my criminal case would be over in 3 seconds flat and more people would be calling for Chief Dunn's resignation -- they've already tried to pay him to go away twice. Documented fact, folks:

http://www.mustbme.com/town-confirms-2-attempts-to-oust-of-bad-chief-of-police-and-his-counter-offer-sounds-a-whole-lot-like-an-extortion-attempt-against-city-and-its-residents.html

In the underlying case, a black kid faced 3 drawn undercover guns and a visual body cavity search and was charged with "loitering," which he beat. No drugs or illegal weapons were found, and his white roomie, who told the police at the time that the two of them were waiting for his girlfriend to leave work, and who also lacked identification, was not hassled. I sent a Demand Letter for $65K to start off negotiations, which NAACP bylaws specifically authorize pre-suit negotiations. Little did I know at the time -- being untrained for the next 2 months -- that authority had to come from the CEO, but that does not a criminal make.

NAACP area President Timmons admits I violated no known bylaw and admits nor did I represent myself as currently-licensed attorney in the letter to Chief Dunn....

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2006/05/chief-dunn-naacps-alleged-extortion.html

....using only "J.D." on the letterhead -- a subject of substantial discussion on this very board on prior occasion, 22 June 2005 to be specific:

http://www.legalunderground.com/2005/06/christopher_kin.html

Given that backdrop, here is a key issue to consider at pretrial. I propose the following syllogism, not bad for such an allegedly incompetent lawyer:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2006/05/kingcast-presents-syllogism-for-judge.html

i. The State -- obviously based on representations by Chief Dunn -- believed that I made incriminating statements at his Deposition.

ii. The State is required to produce a copy of any statements issued by me that it intends to use against me at trial, as well as any excuplatory evidence, per Rule 98.

iii. Therefore the Deposition does not contain any incriminating statements and the entire Deposition is exculpatory because it shows Chief Dunn to be a goddamn liar -- which I have said all along.

-----

In other fun news, my nemesis American Tower Corp., now is "plagued" by a damn Department of Justice securities fraud subpoena.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2006/05/kingcast-presents-skillfully-layed.html

They fired me and two other law-degree-holding worker bees for complaining about corporate abuse.

---

Meanwhile, we are editing a new film that will show how the civil court acted toward me in wrongfully dismissing my Defamation case because I couldn't afford the Deposition, as well as an update on the school board situation in Columbus, Ohio -- where concerned parents have commissioned KingCast.net to document the fact that a known felon has attacked two children on school grounds, with a U.S. Marine and dozens of others ready to testify, but he has not been arrested nor issued a "no trespass" letter. Those who complain about Columbus Public Schools, it seems do receive no trespass letters. Nice.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2006/05/kingcast-presents-vote-of-no.html

Peace.

Ron Miller

Interesting post Chris although I'm not sure how it relates to the topic at hand.

Evan, I did not read the article but the list you made is a good one.

Ron Miller
www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com

Evan

Ron: Christopher's comments rarely related to the topic at hand. Sometime I delete them, sometimes I don't.

The list you liked is a direct quote from the article. It's not my list. It was a good article.

Christopher King

Well Evan I'll be glad to provide some degree of edification for you here:

The prosecutor should have obtained a copy on his own nickel and actually READ the Deposition before he started supporting Chief Dunn's version of what happened in it, and wasted my time and valuable court resources to hold up a trial over it.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2006/06/kingcast-presents-albatross-ii-mending.html

Now Chief Dunn -- who as you know has tormented me for more than a year now with his bogus charges against me -- has been SENT PACKING, and has taken an indefinite "medical leave" from Jaffrey and Lieutenant Bill Oswalt will likely be sworn in as new Chief of Police.

So you see it DOES pay to read Deposition Transcripts before you start talking sh*t about the contents thereof.

Got it?

The townspeople of Jaffrey seemed to get it just fine.

And if you have any more questions about how the Civil case went, just watch the bowtie-wearing Chief Justice tell us that "he doesn't care if what I say is true or not," and watch Chief Dunn's smarmy lawyer refuse to shake my hand in the video at

http://justiceforkids.net

Peace.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

IT'S HERE!

  • A NEW BOOK BY EVAN SCHAEFFER



    How to Feed a Lawyer (and Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground)

    Click on the book cover for details!

Search Trial Practice Tips