Are the lawyers who you work with expressing any of the following ideas--
- A feeling that it's important to videotape all depositions of any witness an opponent might use at trial?
- Surprise that the lawyers' opponents are not videotaping depositions of witnesses the lawyers plan to present at trial?
- A desire to videotape depositions with their own, in-house equipment?
Hat tip: The Discovery Update, 8/09, byAtkinson-Baker Court Reporters.
Related posts:
1. "Videotaping the Deposition of Your Opposing Expert"



Man, have I ever witnessed that trend. A couple of lawyers in our office basically feel you should videotape them all. As there's no rule in our state requiring an official videographer (I know that in at least one state there is such a rule, and the videographer gives an oath, like a court reporter), those lawyers in our firm have taken up setting up a video camera we own to film their depositions themselves.
I have not done it, and frankly, I'm somewhat skeptical that it's necessary.
Posted by: Yeoman | August 15, 2009 at 08:09 AM
I have not seen any increase in videotaping.
Posted by: FredN. | August 18, 2009 at 09:39 AM