My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad



« Using Trial Themes to Defend Catastrophe Losses | Main | Briefs: Make Them Shorter . . . and Trials Too »



I've always said that lawyers are the biggest gamblers I've ever known. What other industry has people investing hundreds of thousands of dollars for something that may or may not pay a single dime. If the cases do pay off, the return can be enormous. It may take years and years to get any return, but it still can be a financial windfall.
According to the criteria listed in this post, the big question seems to be whether or not Pzizer knew that Viagra could cause problems with someones eyesight. My guess would be that this is not a mass tort worth investing in, but I've been wrong before. I remember thinking that many of the people that took Baycol were in poor health to begin with.
Evan, are you looking into these cases? If not, why?


Tom: So far, the closest I've come to litigation involving
Viagra is this post. Why not more? I haven't even looked into enough to answer the question. Maybe I will later.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)



    How to Feed a Lawyer (and Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground)

    Click on the book cover for details!

Search Trial Practice Tips